After reading The Great Unknown, I am defining consciousness as our human ability to be aware and interact with our world, and then remember those interactions and emotions that are tied together in memories.
I agree with researchers Terry Winograd and Richard Feynman who stated that consciousness “lies outside the domain of science.” (Hazen 94) Science has rules to follow. In order for a theory or concept to be scientific, it must follow the rules of research. You must be able to observe consciousness and be able to test it. Then you must be able to repeat it. So the “hard questions” are asked and left unanswered in regards to emotion, perception and reasoning. “How can music evoke a sense of longing, or a poem deep sadness?” is one of many of these questions. (Hazen 95)
I hold out hope that scientific discoveries of the brain and how it works may lead to undiscovered ways of studying consciousness. Since consciousness is on the outskirts of science, maybe another type of research method has yet to be discovered.
I believe our consciousness is a part of what makes each of us unique. My memories are not yours and vice versa. Myself, as a person, and my experiences can not be replicated as you can not be replicated. So for the time being I remain a skeptic, and consciousness remains on the borders of science as “The Great Unknown."